According to the use of force principles, when is the threat of force justified?

The threat of force is justified when the use of force itself is deemed appropriate under the circumstances. This principle aligns with the understanding that law enforcement officers must assess the situation based on several factors, including the level of threat posed by an individual and the context in which the engagement occurs. When officers have a clear justification for using force—such as to protect themselves or others from harm, to prevent a crime, or to make an arrest in a lawful manner—the threat of force is appropriate as a measured response to that situation.

This principle allows officers to maintain control and ensure safety, not only for themselves but for the public as well. The justification must be based on observable behavior and threats posed at that moment, ensuring that there is a legitimate reason for escalating to a physical response if necessary.

Other options either limit the scope of situations in which force can be threatened or do not provide a clear criterion for justifying such actions, thus failing to encompass the broader standards set by use of force policies.